Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Weak distillation of quantum resources
arXiv
Authors: Shinnosuke Onishi, Oliver Hahn, Ryuji Takagi
Year
2026
Paper ID
35660
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Importance sampling based on quasi-probability decomposition is the backbone of many widely used techniques, such as error mitigation, circuit knitting, and, more generally, virtual quantum resource distillation, as it allows one to simulate operations that are not accessible in a given setting. However, this class of protocols faces a fundamental problem - it only allows to estimate expectation values. Here, we provide a general framework that lifts any quasi-probability-based protocol from expectation value estimation to a weak simulator, realizing sampling from the desired distribution only using a restricted class of quantum resources. Our method runs with the sampling cost proportional to the negativity of the quasi-probability, in stark contrast to the naive estimation-based approach that requires a large number of samples even in the case of small negativity. We show that our method requires significantly fewer samples in a number of relevant scenarios, such as error mitigation, entanglement distillation and magic state distillation. Our framework realizes the weak simulation of quantum resources without actually distilling the state, introducing a new notion of quantum resource distillation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Importance sampling based on quasi-probability decomposition is the backbone of many widely used techniques, such as error mitigation, circuit knitting, and, more generally...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.