Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

One-way Unlocalizable Information Deficit

arXiv
Authors: Xue-Na Zhu, Shao-Ming Fei

Year

2013

Paper ID

33526

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

73

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce one-way unlocalizable information deficit with respect to the one-way information deficit, similar to the definition of one-way unlocalizable quantum discord with respect to one-way quantum discord. The properties of the one-way unlocalizable information deficit and the relations among one-way unlocalizable information deficit, one-way unlocalizable quantum discord, one-way quantum discord, one-way information deficit and other quantum correlations are investigated. Analytical formulas of the one-way unlocalizable quantum discord are given to detailed examples.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We introduce one-way unlocalizable information deficit with respect to the one-way information deficit, similar to the definition of one-way unlocalizable quantum discord with...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33526 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69964 Bounded-depth spacetime lattice... #69945 Phase Stable Integrated Delay L...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.