Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Bloch sphere colourings and Bell inequalities
arXiv
Authors: Adrian Kent, Damián Pitalúa-García
Year
2013
Paper ID
33517
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
182
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider here the predictions of quantum theory and local hidden variables for the correlations obtained by measuring a pair of qubits by projections defined by randomly chosen axes separated by a given angle θ. The predictions of local hidden variable models for projective measurements on qubits correspond to binary colourings of the Bloch sphere with antipodal points oppositely coloured. We prove Bell inequalities separating the predictions of all local hidden variable models from the singlet correlations predicted by quantum theory for all θin the range 0 < θ< π/3. We raise and explore the possibility of proving stronger Bell inequalities directly from optimization results on sphere colourings. In particular, we explore strong and weak forms of the hemispherical colouring maximality hypothesis (HCMH) that, for a continuous range of θ> 0, the maximum LHV anti-correlation is obtained by assigning to each qubit a colouring with one hemisphere black and the other white. Our results show that hemispherical colourings are near-optimal for small θ; we also describe numerical tests consistent with the HCMH that bound the range of θ. Finally, we note proofs of related results for binary colourings of R^n.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider here the predictions of quantum theory and local hidden variables for the correlations obtained by measuring a pair of qubits by projections defined by randomly...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.