Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Relativistic symmetries in Rosen-Morse potential and tensor interaction using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method
arXiv
Authors: Sameer M. Ikhdair, majid Hamzavi
Year
2013
Paper ID
33428
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
90
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Approximate analytical bound-state solutions of the Dirac particle in the field of both attractive and repulsive RM potentials including Coulomb-like tensor (CLT) potential are obtained for arbitrary spin-orbit quantum number The Pekeris approximation is used to deal with the spin-orbit coupling terms In the presence of exact spin and pseudospin (p-spin) symmetries, the energy eigenvalues and the corresponding normalized two-component wave functions are found by using the parametric generalization of the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method. The numerical results show that the CLT interaction removes degeneracies between spin and p-spin state doublets.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Approximate analytical bound-state solutions of the Dirac particle in the field of both attractive and repulsive RM potentials including Coulomb-like tensor (CLT) potential are...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.