Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Violation of Bell inequality in perfect translation invariant systems
arXiv
Authors: Zhao-Yu Sun, Yu-Ying Wu, Hai-Lin Huang, Bo-Jun Chen, Bo Wang
Year
2013
Paper ID
33409
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
116
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Bell inequalities and nonlocality have been widely studied in one-dimensional quantum systems. As a kind of quantum correlation, it is expected that bipartite nonlocaity should be present in quantum systems, just as bipartite entanglement does. Surprisingly, for various models, two-qubit states do not violate Bell inequalities, i.e., they are local. Recently, it is realized that the results are related to the monogamy trade-off obeyed by bipartite Bell correlations, thus it is believed that for general translation invariant systems, two-qubit states should not violate the Bell inequality(Oliveira, EPL 100, 60004 (2012)). In this report, we will demonstrate that in perfect translation invariant systems, the Bell inequality can be violated. A nontrivial model is constructed to confirm the conclusion.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Bell inequalities and nonlocality have been widely studied in one-dimensional quantum systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.