Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Simulation of rare events in quantum error correction
arXiv
Authors: Sergey Bravyi, Alexander Vargo
Year
2013
Paper ID
33009
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
148
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider the problem of calculating the logical error probability for a stabilizer quantum code subject to random Pauli errors. To access the regime of large code distances where logical errors are extremely unlikely we adopt the splitting method widely used in Monte Carlo simulations of rare events and Bennett's acceptance ratio method for estimating the free energy difference between two canonical ensembles. To illustrate the power of these methods in the context of error correction, we calculate the logical error probability PL for the 2D surface code on a square lattice with a pair of holes for all code distances dle 20 and all error rates p below the fault-tolerance threshold. Our numerical results confirm the expected exponential decay PLsim exp{[-α(p)d]} and provide a simple fitting formula for the decay rate α(p). Both noiseless and noisy syndrome readout circuits are considered.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider the problem of calculating the logical error probability for a stabilizer quantum code subject to random Pauli errors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.