Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Optimal multi-configuration approximation of an N-fermion wave function
arXiv
Authors: J. M. Zhang, Marcus Kollar
Year
2013
Paper ID
32844
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a simple iterative algorithm to construct the optimal multi-configuration approximation of an N-fermion wave function. That is, Mgeq N single-particle orbitals are sought iteratively so that the projection of the given wave function in the CMN-dimensional configuration subspace is maximized. The algorithm has a monotonic convergence property and can be easily parallelized. The significance of the algorithm on the study of entanglement in a multi-fermion system and its implication on the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree-Fock (MCTDHF) are discussed. The ground state and real-time dynamics of spinless fermions with nearest-neighbor interactions are studied using this algorithm, discussing several subtleties.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a simple iterative algorithm to construct the optimal multi-configuration approximation of an N-fermion wave function.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.