Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Thermodynamics
Self-Correcting Quantum Memories Beyond the Percolation Threshold
arXiv
Authors: Matthew B. Hastings, Grant H. Watson, Roger G. Melko
Year
2013
Paper ID
32782
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We analyze several high dimensional generalizations of the toric code at nonzero temperature. We find that in large enough dimension, there can be a distinct separation between the critical temperature Tc, given by thermodynamic singularities, and the percolation temperature Tp, given by the percolation of defects. We argue that the regime Tp<T<Tc is a range of temperatures where a self-correcting quantum memory can operate despite having percolating defects. We present analytic arguments and numerical evidence in support of this scenario, including a mean-field treatment and Monte Carlo simulations. Near Tc, simulations observe a large hysteretic behavior, which may have applications by allowing the self-correcting phase to survive in a "superheated" regime.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We analyze several high dimensional generalizations of the toric code at nonzero temperature.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.