Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Triply Extended Group of Translations of mathbb{R}4 as Defining Group of NCQM: relation to various gauges
arXiv
Authors: S. Hasibul Hassan Chowdhury, S. Twareque Ali
Year
2013
Paper ID
32500
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The role of the triply extended group of translations of mathbb{R}4, as the defining group of two dimensional noncommutative quantum mechanics (NCQM), has been studied in \cite{ncqmjmp}. In this paper, we revisit the coadjoint orbit structure and various irreducible representations of the group associated with them. The two irreducible representations corresponding to the Landau and symmetric gauges are found to arise from the underlying defining group. The group structure of the transformations, preserving the commutation relations of NCQM, has been studied along with specific examples. Finally, the relationship of a certain family of UIRs of the underlying defining group with a family of deformed complex Hermite polynomials has been explored .
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The role of the triply extended group of translations of mathbbR^4, as the defining group of two dimensional noncommutative quantum mechanics (NCQM), has been studied in...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.