Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Fingerprints of classical memory in quantum hysteresis
arXiv
Authors: Francesco Caravelli
Year
2026
Paper ID
3216
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a simple framework for classical and quantum "memory" in which the Hamiltonian at time t depends on past values of a control Hamiltonian through a causal kernel. This structure naturally describes finite-bandwidth or filtered control channels and provides a clean way to distinguish between memory in the control and genuine non-Markovian dynamics of the state. We focus on models where H(t)=H0+int-inftytK(t-s) H1(s) ds, and illustrate the framework on single-qubit examples such as H(t)=σz+Φ(t)σx with Φ(t)=int-inftytK(t-s) u(s) ds. We derive basic properties of such dynamics, discuss conditions for unitarity, give an equivalent time-local description for exponential kernels, and show explicitly how hysteresis arises in the response of a driven qubit.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a simple framework for classical and quantum "memory" in which the Hamiltonian at time t depends on past values of a control Hamiltonian through a causal kernel.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.