Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Simple Hardy-like proof of quantum contextuality

arXiv
Authors: Adan Cabello, Piotr Badziag, Marcelo Terra Cunha, Mohamed Bourennane

Year

2013

Paper ID

32148

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

117

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Contextuality and nonlocality are two fundamental properties of nature. Hardy's proof is considered the simplest proof of nonlocality and can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest Bell inequality. A fundamental question is: Which is the simplest proof of contextuality? We show that there is a Hardy-like proof of contextuality that can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest noncontextuality inequality. Interestingly, this new proof connects this inequality with the proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem, providing the missing link between these two fundamental results, and can be extended to an arbitrary odd number n of settings, an extension that can be seen as a particular violation of the n-cycle inequality.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Contextuality and nonlocality are two fundamental properties of nature.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #32148 #68413 Emergent Operational Entangleme... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ... #68463 Full characterization of inform... #68461 Agreement and Compatibility in ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.