Quick Navigation
Topics
Topological Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Non-Abelian Chern-Simons Theory from a Hubbard-like Model
arXiv
Authors: Giandomenico Palumbo, Jiannis K. Pachos
Year
2013
Paper ID
31961
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Here, we provide a simple Hubbard-like model of spin-1/2 fermions that gives rise to the SU(2) symmetric Thirring model that is equivalent, in the low-energy limit, to Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons model. First, we identify the regime that simulates the SU(2) Yang-Mills theory. Then, we suitably extend this model so that it gives rise to the SU(2) level k Chern-Simons theory with kgeq2 that can support non-Abelian anyons. This is achieved by introducing multiple fermionic species and modifying the Thirring interactions, while preserving the SU(2) symmetry. Our proposal provides the means to theoretically and experimentally probe non-Abelian SU(2) level k topological phases.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Here, we provide a simple Hubbard-like model of spin-1/2 fermions that gives rise to the SU(2) symmetric Thirring model that is equivalent, in the low-energy limit, to...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.