Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Describing orbit space of global unitary actions for mixed qudit states
arXiv
Authors: Vladimir Gerdt, Arsen Khvedelidze, Yuri Palii
Year
2013
Paper ID
31853
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The unitary U(d)-equivalence relation between elements of the space mathfrak{P}_+ of mixed states of d-dimensional quantum system defines the orbit space mathfrak{P}_+/ U(d) and provides its description in terms the ring mathbb{R}\[mathfrak{P}_+\]U(d) of U(d)-invariant polynomials. We prove that the semi-algebraic structure of mathfrak{P}_+/ U(d) is determined completely by two basic properties of density matrices, their semi-positivity and Hermicity. Particularly, it is shown that the Processi-Schwarz inequalities in elements of integrity basis for mathbb{R}\[mathfrak{P}_+\]U(d) defining the orbit space, are identically satisfied for all elements of mathfrak{P}_+.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The unitary U(d)-equivalence relation between elements of the space mathfrakP_+ of mixed states of d-dimensional quantum system defines the orbit space mathfrakP_+/ U(d) and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.