Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Holographic Geometry of cMERA for Quantum Quenches and Finite Temperature

arXiv
Authors: Ali Mollabashi, Masahiro Nozaki, Shinsei Ryu, Tadashi Takayanagi

Year

2013

Paper ID

31769

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

99

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the time evolution of cMERA (continuous MERA) under quantum quenches in free field theories. We calculate the corresponding holographic metric using the proposal of arXiv:1208.3469 and confirm that it qualitatively agrees with its gravity dual given by a half of the AdS black hole spacetime, argued by Hartman and Maldacena in arXiv:1303.1080. By doubling the cMERA for the quantum quench, we give an explicit construction of finite temperature cMERA. We also study cMERA in the presence of chemical potential and show that there is an enhancement of metric in the infrared region corresponding to the Fermi energy.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the time evolution of cMERA (continuous MERA) under quantum quenches in free field theories.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31769 #73579 QR-SPPS: Quantum-Native Retail ... #73578 Intelligence-Guided Adaptive Pu... #73576 Number Fluctuations and Entangl... #73571 Gaussian Reformulation of the F...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.