You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Simulation

Rank-finiteness for modular categories

arXiv
Authors: Paul Bruillard, Siu-Hung Ng, Eric C. Rowell, Zhenghan Wang

Year

2013

Paper ID

31235

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We prove a rank-finiteness conjecture for modular categories: up to equivalence, there are only finitely many modular categories of any fixed rank. Our technical advance is a generalization of the Cauchy theorem in group theory to the context of spherical fusion categories. For a modular category mathcal{C} with N=ord(T), the order of the modular T-matrix, the Cauchy theorem says that the set of primes dividing the global quantum dimension D2 in the Dedekind domain mathbb{Z}\[e^{frac{2πi}{N}}\] is identical to that of N.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We prove a rank-finiteness conjecture for modular categories: up to equivalence, there are only finitely many modular categories of any fixed rank.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31235 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #68978 Repair Before Veto, When Repair...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.