Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Chemistry

One-photon double ionization of helium: a heuristic formula for the cross section

arXiv
Authors: Morten Førre

Year

2011

Paper ID

31009

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Without a formal derivation, we propose a formula for the total and single-differential cross in the problem of one-photon double ionization of an atom. The formula is benchmarked against accurate experimental data for the total cross section of helium. Furthermore, a direct comparison with ab initio calculations for the double ionization of Li+ suggests that the framework is valid for the entire helium isoelectronic sequence. To this end, we introduce a formula for the double ionization of lithium, as well as for the triple ionization of lithium and beryllium.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Without a formal derivation, we propose a formula for the total and single-differential cross in the problem of one-photon double ionization of an atom.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31009 #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69037 Spin dynamics and ortho-para co... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.