Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Efficient equivalence checking of Clifford-U circuits with shared single-qubit unitaries
arXiv
Authors: Daisuke Sakamoto, Soshun Naito, Yusei Mori, Kosuke Mitarai
Year
2026
Paper ID
30921
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
146
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum circuit equivalence checking asks whether two circuits implement the same unitary. It guarantees compiler correctness and safe optimization, yet most existing approaches scale exponentially with the number of qubits or the circuit depth, or are restricted to specific circuit structures. In this work, we present an equivalence-checking method for circuits formed by arbitrary single-qubit layers interleaved with Clifford layers. This pattern is common in variational quantum algorithms and Hamiltonian simulation via Trotter decomposition. It can also represent any unitary with sufficient depth. We prove the existence of an efficient classical algorithm that determines whether a pair of circuits with shared single-qubit layers are equivalent for every possible choice of the shared single-qubit unitaries. The same algorithm can also certify their non-equivalence for fixed assignments of single-qubit unitaries. Our framework supports the validation of emerging quantum compilers and facilitate the discovery of novel circuit optimization passes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum circuit equivalence checking asks whether two circuits implement the same unitary.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.