Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Non-Resonant Boundary Time Crystals from Quantum Synchronization Breakdown
arXiv
Authors: Jun Wang, Shu Yang, Zeqing Wang, Ran Qi, Haiping Hu, Weidong Li, Jianwen Jie
Year
2026
Paper ID
30813
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum synchronization (QS) in dissipative systems is often inferred from smooth phase locking, leaving open whether its breakdown constitutes a genuine nonequilibrium transition. Here we introduce a Liouvillian framework that classifies driven-dissipative dynamics by the structure of the undriven dissipative background and show that QS breaks down via a Hopf-type dynamical phase transition into a boundary time crystal (BTC). The character of this transition is determined by the background attractor: systems with a self-sustained oscillator (SSO) support robust non-resonant BTCs, whereas those with a polar fixed point (PFP) sustain BTCs only at resonance and lose them under detuning. We identify sharp dynamical and spectral signatures of the QS-BTC transition and thereby establish, within U(1)-symmetric collective-spin Lindbladians driven by a single coherent tone, a background-based allowed/forbidden criterion that unifies QS, its breakdown, and time-crystalline order within a single Liouvillian framework.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum synchronization (QS) in dissipative systems is often inferred from smooth phase locking, leaving open whether its breakdown constitutes a genuine nonequilibrium transition.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.