Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Almost perfect strategies for projection games are approximately tracial
arXiv
Authors: Eric Culf
Year
2026
Paper ID
30791
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Projection games constitute an important class of nonlocal games where, for any answer from the first player, there is a unique correct answer for the second player. This class of games captures nonlocal games arising from constraint satisfaction problems, oracularisations, and unique games. However, due to the asymmetry between the players, projection games are in general not synchronous, and therefore the powerful results constraining the structure of almost perfect strategies for synchronous games do not apply. In this work, we adapt results of Marrakchi and de la Salle for synchronous games to show that, in both the quantum and commuting-operator models, any strategy that wins with probability 1-varepsilon in a projection game gives rise to a tracial strategy that wins with probability 1-O\((Lvarepsilon\)1/4), where L is the inverse of the minimal conditional probability of a question for the second player being sampled given a question to the first. For constraint system games, this strengthens the rounding result of Paddock by eliminating the dependence on number of constraints and improving the dependence on constraint size, while also generalising to the commuting-operator setting.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Projection games constitute an important class of nonlocal games where, for any answer from the first player, there is a unique correct answer for the second player.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.