Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
An asymmetry lower bound on fermionic non-Gaussianity
arXiv
Authors: Filiberto Ares, Michele Mazzoni, Sara Murciano, Dávid Szász-Schagrin, Pasquale Calabrese, Lorenzo Piroli
Year
2026
Paper ID
30681
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fermionic Gaussian states are a fundamental tool in many-body physics, faithfully representing non-interacting quantum systems and allowing for efficient numerical simulations. Given a many-body wave function, it is therefore interesting to ask how much it differs from that of a Gaussian state, as quantified by the notion of non-Gaussianity. In this work, we relate measures of non-Gaussianity with the Shannon entropy of the particle-number distribution, coinciding with the particle-number asymmetry for pure states. We derive a lower bound on the relative entropy of non-Gaussianity in terms of the exponential of the Shannon entropy, and study numerically its tightness for large system sizes. Our bound is non-trivial for large values of the asymmetry and relies on the concentration of the particle-number distribution of (mixed) fermionic Gaussian states. Since the Shannon entropy of the particle-number distribution is often efficient to compute or experimentally measure, our results can be viewed as a practical way to lower bound non-Gaussianity, highlighting a non-trivial interplay with particle-number asymmetry.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fermionic Gaussian states are a fundamental tool in many-body physics, faithfully representing non-interacting quantum systems and allowing for efficient numerical simulations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.