Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Photonic Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Atomic Frequency Comb storage as a slow-light effect

arXiv

Authors: M. Bonarota, J. -L. Le Gouët, S. A. Moiseev, T. Chanelière

Year

2011

Paper ID

29440

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Atomic Frequency Comb (AFC) protocol has been particularly successful recently to demonstrate the storage of quantum information in a solid medium (rare-earth doped crystals). The AFC is inspired by the photon-echo technique. We show in this paper that the AFC is actually closely related to the slow-light based storage protocols extensively used in atomic vapours. Experimental verifications are performed in thulium doped YAG (Tm3+:YAG). We clarify the interplay between absorption and dispersion and propose a classification of the existing protocols.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Atomic Frequency Comb (AFC) protocol has been particularly successful recently to demonstrate the storage of quantum information in a solid medium (rare-earth doped crystals).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1112.0338 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0338 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0338

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.