Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Simulation
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Some Languages Recognized by Two-Way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States
arXiv
Authors: Shenggen Zheng, Daowen Qiu, Lvzhou Li
Year
2011
Paper ID
29243
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
{\it Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states} (2QCFA) were introduced by Ambainis and Watrous, and it was shown that 2QCFA have superiority over {\it two-way probabilistic finite automata} (2PFA) for recognizing some non-regular languages such as the language Leq=\{anbnmid nin mathbf{N}\} and the palindrome language Lpal=\{ωin \{a,b\}^*midω=ωR\}, where xR is x in the reverse order. It is interesting to find more languages like these that witness the superiority of 2QCFA over 2PFA. In this paper, we consider the language Lm=\{xcymid Σ=\{a, b, c\}, x,yin\{a,b\}*,cinΣ, |x|=|y|\} that is similar to the middle language Lmiddle=\{xaymid x,yinΣ*,ainΣ, |x|=|y|\}. We prove that the language Lm can be recognized by 2QCFA with one-sided error in polynomial expected time. Also, we show that Lm can be recognized by 2PFA with bounded error, but only in exponential expected time. Thus Lm is another witness of the fact that 2QCFA are more powerful than their classical counterparts.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- it Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states (2QCFA) were introduced by Ambainis and Watrous, and it was shown that 2QCFA have superiority over it two-way...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.