Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Order Unit Spaces and Probabilistic Models
arXiv
Authors: John Harding, Alex Wilce
Year
2026
Paper ID
28734
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We exhibit a functor from the category OUS of order unit spaces and positive, unit-preserving mappings into the category Prob of probabilistic models (test spaces with designated state spaces) and morphisms thereof. Restricted to any subcategory of OUS monoidal with respect to a positive, normalized, bilinear composition rule, our functor is also monoidal. This shows that the convex-operational approach to physical theories can be subsumed by the test-space approach, without resort to "generalized test spaces". A second construction, equipping a probabilistic model with tests representing "weighted coins", also sheds light on the nature of unsharp observables.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We exhibit a functor from the category OUS of order unit spaces and positive, unit-preserving mappings into the category Prob of probabilistic models (test spaces with...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.