Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Simulation

Order Unit Spaces and Probabilistic Models

arXiv
Authors: John Harding, Alex Wilce

Year

2026

Paper ID

28734

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We exhibit a functor from the category OUS of order unit spaces and positive, unit-preserving mappings into the category Prob of probabilistic models (test spaces with designated state spaces) and morphisms thereof. Restricted to any subcategory of OUS monoidal with respect to a positive, normalized, bilinear composition rule, our functor is also monoidal. This shows that the convex-operational approach to physical theories can be subsumed by the test-space approach, without resort to "generalized test spaces". A second construction, equipping a probabilistic model with tests representing "weighted coins", also sheds light on the nature of unsharp observables.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We exhibit a functor from the category OUS of order unit spaces and positive, unit-preserving mappings into the category Prob of probabilistic models (test spaces with...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #28734 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.