Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Foundations

Entanglement detection via some classes of measurements

arXiv
Authors: Shu-Qian Shen, Ming Li, Xue-Feng Duan

Year

2015

Paper ID

27520

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Based on the mutually unbiased bases, the mutually unbiased measurements and the general symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures, we propose three separability criteria for d-dimensional bipartite quantum systems, which are more powerful than the corresponding ones introduced in \[C. Spengler, M. Huber, S. Brierley, T. Adaktylos, and B.C. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. A 86, 022311 (2012); B. Chen, T. Ma, and S.M. Fei, Phys. Rev. A 89, 064302 (2014); B. Chen, T. Li, and S.M. Fei, arXiv:1406.7820v1 [quant-ph\] (2014)]. Some states such as Werner states and Bell-diagonal states are used to further illustrate the efficiency of the presented criteria.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Based on the mutually unbiased bases, the mutually unbiased measurements and the general symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures, we propose three...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #27520 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.