Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Optimization
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
NAND-Trees, Average Choice Complexity, and Effective Resistance
arXiv
Authors: Stacey Jeffery, Shelby Kimmel
Year
2015
Paper ID
26263
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show that the quantum query complexity of evaluating NAND-tree instances with average choice complexity at most W is O(W), where average choice complexity is a measure of the difficulty of winning the associated two-player game. This generalizes a superpolynomial speedup over classical query complexity due to Zhan et al. [Zhan et al., ITCS 2012, 249-265]. We further show that the player with a winning strategy for the two-player game associated with the NAND-tree can win the game with an expected widetilde{O}\(N1/4sqrt{{cal C}(x\)}) quantum queries against a random opponent, where {cal C }(x) is the average choice complexity of the instance. This gives an improvement over the query complexity of the naive strategy, which costs widetilde{O}\(sqrt{N}\) queries. The results rely on a connection between NAND-tree evaluation and st-connectivity problems on certain graphs, and span programs for st-connectivity problems. Our results follow from relating average choice complexity to the effective resistance of these graphs, which itself corresponds to the span program witness size.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show that the quantum query complexity of evaluating NAND-tree instances with average choice complexity at most W is O(W), where average choice complexity is a measure of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.