Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Dirac Wave Functions of Positive Energy with Arbitrarily Small Position Uncertainty
arXiv
Authors: Ilmar Bürck, Roderich Tumulka
Year
2026
Paper ID
25798
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider wave functions in the Hilbert space mathcal{H}=L2\(mathbb{R}3,mathbb{C}4\) of a single Dirac particle, specifically from the positive-energy subspace mathcal{H}_+ of the free Dirac Hamiltonian. Over the decades, various authors conjectured that for wave functions from mathcal{H}_+, there is a positive lower bound to the position uncertainty σx; in other words, that such states cannot be arbitrarily narrow in x. Building on work by Bracken and Melloy, we show that this conjecture is false. (In fact, they already stated that this conjecture is false and already had a counter-example, but their proof that it is a counter-example had a gap.)
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider wave functions in the Hilbert space mathcalH=L^2(mathbbR^3,mathbbC^4) of a single Dirac particle, specifically from the positive-energy subspace mathcalH_+ of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.