Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Dirac Wave Functions of Positive Energy with Arbitrarily Small Position Uncertainty

arXiv
Authors: Ilmar Bürck, Roderich Tumulka

Year

2026

Paper ID

25798

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider wave functions in the Hilbert space mathcal{H}=L2\(mathbb{R}3,mathbb{C}4\) of a single Dirac particle, specifically from the positive-energy subspace mathcal{H}_+ of the free Dirac Hamiltonian. Over the decades, various authors conjectured that for wave functions from mathcal{H}_+, there is a positive lower bound to the position uncertainty σx; in other words, that such states cannot be arbitrarily narrow in x. Building on work by Bracken and Melloy, we show that this conjecture is false. (In fact, they already stated that this conjecture is false and already had a counter-example, but their proof that it is a counter-example had a gap.)

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider wave functions in the Hilbert space mathcalH=L^2(mathbbR^3,mathbbC^4) of a single Dirac particle, specifically from the positive-energy subspace mathcalH_+ of the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25798 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.