Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Exponential Euclidean Decay and Spectral Support Separation in Osterwalder-Schrader Reconstruction

OpenAlex
Authors: A. Kim

Year

2026

Paper ID

25546

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

75

Citations

0

Abstract

We establish exponential Euclidean decay and spectral support separation conditions sufficient for Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction of relativistic quantum field theories. The analysis isolates a structural separation between the spectral support of excitations and Euclidean decay scales, providing a framework in which reflection positivity and spectral positivity jointly enforce reconstruction. The results clarify how Euclidean correlation decay encodes the spectral structure of physical excitations and provide a pathway toward spectral-gap formulations in constructive quantum field theory.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We establish exponential Euclidean decay and spectral support separation conditions sufficient for Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction of relativistic quantum field theories.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25546 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-24 11:59:01

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.