Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Informational Duality: A Falsifiable Ontological Extension of Physical State Description
OpenAlex
Authors: Sumeru Ray
Year
2026
Paper ID
25522
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
125
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a dual-layer ontological interpretation of physical systems, termed Quantum Informational Duality (QID). According to this framework, every physical system admits two inseparable descriptions: a material–energetic layer governed by established physical laws, and a complete informational layer corresponding to the system’s total quantum state. The informational layer introduces no new particles, fields, or energy and does not violate conservation principles. Instead, it represents an ontologically real encoding of the system’s quantum state. We hypothesize that repeated structured interactions may generate persistent informational residual structures, potentially leading to measurable deviations in decoherence dynamics under controlled conditions. A falsifiable experimental protocol using superconducting qubit platforms is proposed. The framework remains speculative but testable, and its scientific validity depends entirely on independent experimental verification.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a dual-layer ontological interpretation of physical systems, termed Quantum Informational Duality (QID).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.