Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
ND-Photonic QRNGs in a Noisy Environment
arXiv
Authors: J. M. Agüero Trejo, Cristian S. Calude, O. C. Stoica
Year
2026
Paper ID
75791
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Standard pseudo-random generators have weaknesses that have led to the development of quantum random number generators (QRNGs). However, common QRNG validation methods, whether based on quantum indeterminism or statistical tests, are insufficient to guarantee high-quality randomness. In contrast, a mathematical theory based on the Located Kochen-Specker Theorem proves that 3D QRNGs produce maximally unpredictable outputs without using entanglement, and both theory and experiments have supported their security. The paper focuses on a practical photonic implementation of a 3D QRNG that is easier to deploy than cryogenic superconducting implementations. As any physical implementation is subject to various measurement errors, it is important to study theoretically and experimentally the type and role of errors in 3D QRNGs. In this paper, we will model the photonic 3D QRNG as an open quantum system, constructed as an arrangement of imperfect beam-splitters with a range of losses based on the fidelity of its components, and we will show that under certain conditions, the process remains within the scope of the Kochen-Specker Theorem, which guarantees maximum unpredictability.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Standard pseudo-random generators have weaknesses that have led to the development of quantum random number generators (QRNGs).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.