Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum mechanical treatment of large spin baths
arXiv
Authors: Robin Röhrig, Philipp Schering, Lars B. Gravert, Benedikt Fauseweh, Götz S. Uhrig
Year
2017
Paper ID
24930
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
130
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The electronic spin in quantum dots can be described by central spin models (CSMs) with a very large number Neff approx 104 to 106 of bath spins posing a tremendous challenge to theoretical simulations. Here, a fully quantum mechanical theory is developed for the limit Neff → infty by means of iterated equations of motion (iEoM). We find that the CSM can be mapped to a four-dimensional impurity coupled to a non-interacting bosonic bath in this limit. Remarkably, even for infinite bath the CSM does not become completely classical. The data obtained by the proposed iEoM approach is tested successfully against data from other, established approaches. Thus, the iEoM mapping extends the set of theoretical tools which can be used to understand the spin dynamics in large CSMs.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The electronic spin in quantum dots can be described by central spin models (CSMs) with a very large number Neff approx 10^4 to 10^6 of bath spins posing a tremendous challenge...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.