Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Near-Exact Non-relativistic Ionisation Energies for Many-Electron Atoms
arXiv
Authors: E. O. Jobunga
Year
2017
Paper ID
24446
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
154
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Electron-electron interactions and correlations form the basis of difficulties encountered in the theoretical solution of problems dealing with multi-electron systems. Accurate treatment of the electron-electron problem is likely to unravel some nice physical properties of matter embedded in the interaction. In an effort to tackle this many-body problem, a symmetry-dependent all electron potential generalised for an n-electron atom is suggested in this study. The symmetry dependence in the proposed potential hinges on an empirically determined angular momentum dependent partitioning fraction for the electron-electron interaction. With the potential, all atoms are treated in the same way regardless of whether they are open- or closed-shell using their system specific information. The non-relativistic groundstate ionisation potentials for atoms with up to 103 electrons generated using the all-electron potential are in reasonable agreement with the existing experimental and theoretical data. The effects of higher-order non-relativistic interactions as well as the finite nuclear mass of the atoms are also analysed.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Electron-electron interactions and correlations form the basis of difficulties encountered in the theoretical solution of problems dealing with multi-electron systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.