Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Simulation
Two new results about quantum exact learning
arXiv
Authors: Srinivasan Arunachalam, Sourav Chakraborty, Troy Lee, Manaswi Paraashar, Ronald de Wolf
Year
2018
Paper ID
24330
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present two new results about exact learning by quantum computers. First, we show how to exactly learn a k-Fourier-sparse n-bit Boolean function from O\(k1.5(log k\)2) uniform quantum examples for that function. This improves over the bound of widetildeÎ(kn) uniformly random classical examples (Haviv and Regev, CCC'15). Additionally, we provide a possible direction to improve our widetilde{O}\(k1.5\) upper bound by proving an improvement of Chang's lemma for k-Fourier-sparse Boolean functions. Second, we show that if a concept class mathcal{C} can be exactly learned using Q quantum membership queries, then it can also be learned using Oleft\(frac{Q2}{log Q}log|mathcal{C}|right\) classical membership queries. This improves the previous-best simulation result (Servedio and Gortler, SICOMP'04) by a log Q-factor.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present two new results about exact learning by quantum computers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.