Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Thermodynamics
Quantum Chemistry
A Comparative Interpretation of the Thermodynamic Functions of a Relativistic Bound State problem proposed with an Attractive or a Repulsive Surface Effect
arXiv
Authors: B. C. Lütfüoğlu, J. Kříž
Year
2018
Paper ID
23683
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
154
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Generalized symmetric Woods-Saxon potential (GSWSP) energy well has a significant importance not only in nuclear physics but also in atomic and molecular physics. A GSWSP energy well takes the surface effects (describing e.g. repulsive interaction at the nucleus edge in nuclear physics) into account in addition to the volume effect. These effects can be, in general, both repulsive or attractive. In this paper, the recently obtained bound state solution of the Klein-Gordon equation with vector and scalar GSWSP energy in the spin symmetry limit is used to calculate a neutral pion's energy spectra in attractive and repulsive cases via various potential parameters. Then, the spectra are employed to find the thermodynamic functions such as Helmholtz free energy, entropy, internal energy, and specific heat. These functions in the attractive and repulsive cases are compared comprehensively. Finally, the role of the shape parameters on the thermodynamic functions in repulsive and attractive cases, respectively, is analyzed.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Generalized symmetric Woods-Saxon potential (GSWSP) energy well has a significant importance not only in nuclear physics but also in atomic and molecular physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.