Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Proposal for an optical interferometric measurement of the gravitational red-shift with satellite systems
arXiv
Authors: Daniel R. Terno, Francesco Vedovato, Matteo Schiavon, Alexander R. H. Smith, Piergiovanni Magnani, Giuseppe Vallone, Paolo Villoresi
Year
2018
Paper ID
23412
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) underpins all metric theories of gravity. One of its key aspects is the local position invariance (LPI) of non-gravitational experiments, which is captured by the gravitational red-shift. The iconic gravitational red-shift experiment places two fermionic systems, used as clocks, in different gravitational potentials and compares them using the electromagnetic field. However, the electromagnetic field itself can be used as a clock, by comparing the phases acquired by two optical pulses propagating through different gravitational potentials. A fundamental point in the implementation of a satellite large-distance optical interferometric experiment is the suppression of the first-order Doppler effect, which dominates the weak gravitational signal necessary to test the EEP. Here, we propose a novel scheme to suppress it, by subtracting the phase-shifts measured in the one-way and in the two-way configuration between a ground station and a satellite. We present a detailed analysis of this technique within the post-Newtonian framework and perform some simulations of its performance using realistic satellite orbits and the state-of-the-art fiber technology at the telecom wavelength of 1550 nm.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) underpins all metric theories of gravity.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.