Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Simulation
Finite-Depth, Finite-Shot Guarantees for Constrained Quantum Optimization via Fejér Filtering
arXiv
Authors: Chinonso Onah, Kristel Michielsen
Year
2026
Paper ID
22482
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study finite-layer alternations of the Constraint--Enhanced Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CE--QAOA), a constraint-aware ansatz that operates natively on block one-hot manifolds. Our focus is on feasibility and optimality guarantees. We show that restricting cost angles to a harmonic lattice exposes a positive Fejér filter acting on the cost-phase unitary UC(γ)=e-iγHC in a cost-dephased reference model (used only for analysis). Under a wrapped phase-separation condition, this yields dimension-free finite-depth and finite-shot lower bounds on the success probability of sampling an optimal solution. In particular, we obtain a ratio-form guarantee \[ q_0 \;\ge\; \frac{x}{1+x}, \qquad x \;=\; (p{+}1)^2 \sin^2(δ/2)\,C_β, \] where q0 is the single-shot success probability, C_β is the mixer-envelope mass on the optimal set, δ is a phase-gap proxy, and p is the number of layers. Riemann--Lebesgue averaging extends the discussion beyond exact lattice normalization. We conclude by outlining coherent realizations of hardware-efficient positive spectral filters as a main open direction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study finite-layer alternations of the Constraint--Enhanced Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CE--QAOA), a constraint-aware ansatz that operates natively on block...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.