Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Simulation

Polyadic Quantum Classifier

arXiv
Authors: William Cappelletti, Rebecca Erbanni, Joaquín Keller

Year

2020

Paper ID

21914

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

99

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce here a supervised quantum machine learning algorithm for multi-class classification on NISQ architectures. A parametric quantum circuit is trained to output a specific bit string corresponding to the class of the input datapoint. We train and test it on an IBMq 5-qubit quantum computer and the algorithm shows good accuracy --compared to a classical machine learning model-- for ternary classification of the Iris dataset and an extension of the XOR problem. Furthermore, we evaluate with simulations how the algorithm fares for a binary and a quaternary classification on resp. a known binary dataset and a synthetic dataset.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We introduce here a supervised quantum machine learning algorithm for multi-class classification on NISQ architectures.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21914 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69003 QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68978 Repair Before Veto, When Repair...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.