You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Lowering Tomography Costs in Quantum Simulation with a Symmetry Projected Operator Basis
arXiv
Authors: Scott E. Smart, David A. Mazziotti
Year
2020
Paper ID
21499
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
95
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Measurement in quantum simulations provides a means for extracting meaningful information from a complex quantum state, and for quantum computing reducing the complexity of measurement will be vital for near-term applications. For most quantum simulations, the targeted state will obey a number of symmetries inherent to the system Hamiltonian. We obtain a alternative symmetry projected basis of measurement that reduces the number of measurements needed. Our scheme can be implemented at no additional cost on a quantum computer, can be implemented under a variety of measurement or tomography schemes, and is fairly resilient under noise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Measurement in quantum simulations provides a means for extracting meaningful information from a complex quantum state, and for quantum computing reducing the complexity of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.