Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Machine Learning
Towards the design of chemical reactions: Machine learning barriers of competing mechanisms in reactant space
arXiv
Authors: Stefan Heinen, Guido Falk von Rudorff, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld
Year
2020
Paper ID
20367
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
255
Citations
N/A
Abstract
While sophisticated numerical methods for studying equilibrium states have well advanced, quantitative predictions of kinetic behaviour remain challenging. We introduce a reactant-to-barrier (R2B) machine learning model that rapidly and accurately infers activation energies and transition state geometries throughout chemical compound space. R2B enjoys improving accuracy as training sets grow, and requires as input solely molecular graph information of the reactant. We provide numerical evidence for the applicability of R2B for two competing text-book reactions relevant to organic synthesis, E2 and SN2, trained and tested on chemically diverse quantum data from literature. After training on 1k to 1.8k examples, R2B predicts activation energies on average within less than 2.5 kcal/mol with respect to Coupled-Cluster Singles Doubles (CCSD) reference within milliseconds. Principal component analysis of kernel matrices reveals the hierarchy of the multiple scales underpinning reactivity in chemical space: Nucleophiles and leaving groups, substituents, and pairwise substituent combinations correspond to systematic lowering of eigenvalues. Analysis of R2B based predictions of 11.5k E2 and SN2 barriers in gas-phase for previously undocumented reactants indicates that on average E2 is favored in 75% of all cases and that SN2 becomes likely for nucleophile/leaving group corresponding to chlorine, and for substituents consisting of hydrogen or electron-withdrawing groups. Experimental reaction design from first principles is enabled thanks to R2B, which is demonstrated by the construction of decision trees. Numerical R2B based results for interatomic distances and angles of reactant and transition state geometries suggest that Hammond's postulate is applicable to SN2, but not to E2.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- While sophisticated numerical methods for studying equilibrium states have well advanced, quantitative predictions of kinetic behaviour remain challenging.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.