Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Quantum Simulation
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Gravitational Contact Interactions and the Physical Equivalence of Weyl Transformations in Effective Field Theory
arXiv
Authors: Christopher T. Hill, Graham G. Ross
Year
2020
Paper ID
20303
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Theories of scalars and gravity, with non-minimal interactions, sim \(MP2 +F(φ\) )R +L(φ), have graviton exchange induced contact terms. These terms arise in single particle reducible diagrams with vertices propto q2 that cancel the Feynman propagator denominator 1/q2 and are familiar in various other physical contexts. In gravity these lead to additional terms in the action such as sim F(φ) T_μ^μ(φ)/MP2 and F(φ)partial2 F(φ)/MP2. The contact terms are equivalent to induced operators obtained by a Weyl transformation that removes the non-minimal interactions, leaving a minimal Einstein-Hilbert gravitational action. This demonstrates explicitly the equivalence of different representations of the action under Weyl transformations, both classically and quantum mechanically. To avoid such "hidden contact terms" one is compelled to go to the minimal Einstein-Hilbert representation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Theories of scalars and gravity, with non-minimal interactions, sim (MP^2 +F(φ) )R +L(φ), have graviton exchange induced contact terms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.