Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Simulation
Improving nonstoquastic quantum annealing with spin-reversal transformations
arXiv
Authors: Eleni Marina Lykiardopoulou, Alex Zucca, Sam A. Scivier, Mohammad H. Amin
Year
2020
Paper ID
20292
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
87
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians are hard to simulate due to the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulation. It is however unclear whether nonstoquasticity can lead to advantage in quantum annealing. Here we show that YY-interaction between the qubits makes the adiabatic path during quantum annealing, and therefore the performance, dependent on spin-reversal transformations. With the right choice of spin-reversal transformation, a nonstoquastic Hamiltonian with YY-interaction can outperform stoquastic Hamiltonians with similar parameters. We introduce an optimization protocol to determine the optimal transformation and discuss the effect of suboptimality.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Nonstoquastic Hamiltonians are hard to simulate due to the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.