Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Detecting Entanglement in Unfaithful States
arXiv
Authors: Yongtao Zhan, Hoi-Kwong Lo
Year
2020
Paper ID
20006
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
130
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Entanglement witness is an effective method to detect entanglement in unknown states without doing full tomography. One of the most widespread schemes of witnessing entanglement is measuring its fidelity with respect to a pure entangled state. Recently, a large class of states whose entanglement can not be detected with the fidelity witness has been discovered in Phys.Rev.Lett 124,200502(2020). They are called unfaithful states. In this paper we propose a new way to detect entanglement by calculating the lower bound of entanglement using measurement results. Numerical simulation shows our method can detect entanglement in unfaithful states with a small number of measurements. Moreover, we generalize our scheme to multipartite states and show that it can tolerate higher noise than previous entanglement witness operators with same number of measurement settings.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Entanglement witness is an effective method to detect entanglement in unknown states without doing full tomography.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.