Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Sensing Metrology
Improved limits for violations of local position invariance from atomic clock comparisons
arXiv
Authors: R. Lange, N. Huntemann, J. M. Rahm, C. Sanner, H. Shao, B. Lipphardt, Chr. Tamm, S. Weyers, E. Peik
Year
2020
Paper ID
19981
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
136
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We compare two optical clocks based on the 2S1/2\(F=0\)→ {}2D3/2\(F=2\) electric quadrupole (E2) and the 2S1/2\(F=0\)→ {}2F7/2\(F=3\) electric octupole (E3) transition of 171Yb+ and measure the frequency ratio νE3/νE2=0.932 829 404 530 965 376(32). We determine the transition frequency νE3=642 121 496 772 645.10(8) Hz using two caesium fountain clocks. Repeated measurements of both quantities over several years are analyzed for potential violations of local position invariance. We improve by factors of about 20 and 2 the limits for fractional temporal variations of the fine structure constant α to 1.0(1.1)times10-18/yr and of the proton-to-electron mass ratio μ to -8(36)times10-18/yr. Using the annual variation of the Sun's gravitational potential at Earth Φ, we improve limits for a potential coupling of both constants to gravity, \(c2/α\) (dα/dΦ)=14(11)times 10-9 and \(c2/μ\) (dμ/dΦ)=7(45)times 10-8.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We compare two optical clocks based on the ^2S1/2(F=0) -> ^2D3/2(F=2) electric quadrupole (E2) and the ^2S1/2(F=0) -> ^2F7/2(F=3) electric octupole (E3) transition of ^171Yb^+...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.