Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Variability and Fidelity Limits of Silicon Quantum Gates Due to Random Interface Charge Traps
arXiv
Authors: Tong Wu, Jing Guo
Year
2020
Paper ID
19395
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Silicon offers an attractive material platform for hardware realization of quantum computing. In this study, a microscopic stochastic simulation method is developed to model the effect of random interface charge traps in silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) quantum gates. The statistical results show that by using a fast two-qubit gate in isotopically purified silicon, the two-qubit silicon-based quantum gates have the fidelity >98% with a probability of 75% for the state-of-the-art MOS interface quality. By using a composite gate pulse, the fidelity can be further improved to >99.5% with the 75% probability. The variations between the quantum gate devices, however, are largely due to the small number of traps per device. The results highlight the importance of variability consideration due to random charge traps and potential to improve fidelity in silicon-based quantum computing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Silicon offers an attractive material platform for hardware realization of quantum computing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.