Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Comparative Study of Sampling-Based Simulation Costs of Noisy Quantum Circuits
arXiv
Authors: Shigeo Hakkaku, Keisuke Fujii
Year
2020
Paper ID
19354
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Noise in quantum operations often negates the advantage of quantum computation. However, most classical simulations of quantum computers calculate the ideal probability amplitudes either storing full state vectors or using sophisticated tensor network contractions. Here, we investigate sampling-based classical simulation methods for noisy quantum circuits. Specifically, we characterize the simulation costs of two major schemes, stabilizer-state sampling of magic states and Heisenberg propagation, for quantum circuits being subject to stochastic Pauli noise, such as depolarizing and dephasing noise. To this end, we introduce several techniques for the stabilizer-state sampling to reduce the simulation costs under such noise. It revealed that in the low noise regime, stabilizer-state sampling results in a smaller sampling cost, while Heisenberg propagation is better in the high noise regime. Furthermore, for a high depolarizing noise rate sim 10\%, these methods provide better scaling compared to that given by the low-rank stabilizer decomposition. We believe that these knowledge of classical simulation costs is useful to squeeze possible quantum advantage on near-term noisy quantum devices as well as efficient classical simulation methods.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Noise in quantum operations often negates the advantage of quantum computation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.