Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Stoquastic ground states are classical thermal distributions

arXiv
Authors: Robbie King, Sergii Strelchuk

Year

2020

Paper ID

19229

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

78

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the structure of the ground states of local stoquastic Hamiltonians and show that under mild assumptions the following distributions can efficiently approximate one another: (a) distributions arising from ground states of stoquastic Hamiltonians, (b) distributions arising from ground states of stoquastic frustration-free Hamiltonians, (c) Gibbs distributions of local classical Hamiltonian, and (d) distributions represented by real-valued Deep Boltzmann machines. In addition, we highlight regimes where it is possible to efficiently classically sample from the above distributions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the structure of the ground states of local stoquastic Hamiltonians and show that under mild assumptions the following distributions can efficiently approximate one...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19229 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.