Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
A Likelihood Ratio-Based Detector for QTMS Radar and Noise Radar
arXiv
Authors: David Luong, Bhashyam Balaji, Sreeraman Rajan
Year
2020
Paper ID
19179
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We derive a detector function for quantum two-mode squeezing (QTMS) radars and noise radars that is based on the use of a likelihood ratio (LR) test for distinguishing between the presence and absence of a target. In addition to an explicit expression for the LR detector, we derive a detector function which approximates the LR detector in the limit where the target is small, far away, or otherwise difficult to detect. When the number of integrated samples is large, we derive a theoretical expression for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the radar when the LR detector is used. When the number of samples is small, we use simulations to understand the ROC curve behavior of the detector. One interesting finding is there exists a parameter regime in which a previously-studied detector outperforms the LR detector, contrary to the intuition that LR tests are optimal. This is because neither the Neyman-Pearson lemma, nor the Karlin-Rubin theorem which generalizes the lemma, hold in this particular problem. However, the LR detector remains a good choice for target detection.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We derive a detector function for quantum two-mode squeezing (QTMS) radars and noise radars that is based on the use of a likelihood ratio (LR) test for distinguishing between...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.