Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Proposal for entangling gates on fluxonium qubits via a two-photon transition
arXiv
Authors: Konstantin N. Nesterov, Quentin Ficheux, Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Maxim G. Vavilov
Year
2020
Paper ID
19149
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a family of microwave-activated entangling gates on two capacitively coupled fluxonium qubits. A microwave pulse applied to either qubit at a frequency near the half-frequency of the |00rangle - |11rangle transition induces two-photon Rabi oscillations with a negligible leakage outside the computational subspace, owing to the strong anharmonicity of fluxoniums. By adjusting the drive frequency, amplitude, and duration, we obtain the gate family that is locally equivalent to the fermionic-simulation gates such as sqrt{rm SWAP}-like and controlled-phase gates. The gate error can be tuned below 10-4 for a pulse duration under 100 ns without excessive circuit parameter matching. Given that the fluxonium coherence time can exceed 1 ms, our gate scheme is promising for large-scale quantum processors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a family of microwave-activated entangling gates on two capacitively coupled fluxonium qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.