Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Simulated Quantum Annealing is Efficient on the Spike Hamiltonian
arXiv
Authors: Thiago Bergamaschi
Year
2020
Paper ID
18865
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
126
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work we study the convergence of a classical algorithm called Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA) on the Spike Hamiltonian, a specific toy model Hamiltonian for quantum-mechanical tunneling introduced by [FGG02]. This toy model Hamiltonian encodes a simple bit-symmetric cost function f in the computational basis, and is used to emulate local minima in more complex optimization problems. In previous work [CH16] showed that SQA runs in polynomial time in much of the regime of spikes that QA does, pointing to evidence against an exponential speedup through tunneling. In this paper we extend their analysis to the remaining polynomial regime of energy gaps of the spike Hamiltonian, to show that indeed QA presents no exponential speedup with respect to SQA on this family of toy models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work we study the convergence of a classical algorithm called Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA) on the Spike Hamiltonian, a specific toy model Hamiltonian for...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.