Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Tensor Network Quantum Simulator With Step-Dependent Parallelization

arXiv
Authors: Danylo Lykov, Roman Schutski, Alexey Galda, Valerii Vinokur, Yuri Alexeev

Year

2020

Paper ID

18734

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work, we present a new large-scale quantum circuit simulator. It is based on the tensor network contraction technique to represent quantum circuits. We propose a novel parallelization algorithm based on \stepslice . In this paper, we push the requirement on the size of a quantum computer that will be needed to demonstrate the advantage of quantum computation with Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). We computed 210 qubit QAOA circuits with 1,785 gates on 1,024 nodes of the the Cray XC 40 supercomputer Theta. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the largest QAOA quantum circuit simulations reported to this date.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work, we present a new large-scale quantum circuit simulator.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #18734 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.