Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Reforming Takeuti's Quantum Set Theory to Satisfy De Morgan's Laws
arXiv
Authors: Masanao Ozawa
Year
2020
Paper ID
18708
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In 1981, Takeuti introduced set theory based on quantum logic by constructing a model analogous to Boolean-valued models for Boolean logic. He defined the quantum logical truth value for every sentence of set theory. He showed that equality axioms do not hold, while axioms of ZFC set theory hold if appropriately modified with the notion of commutators. Here, we consider the problem in Takeuti's quantum set theory that De Morgan's laws do not hold for bounded quantifiers. We construct a counter-example to De Morgan's laws for bounded quantifiers in Takeuti's quantum set theory. We redefine the truth value for the membership relation and bounded existential quantification to ensure that De Morgan's laws hold. Then, we show that the truth value of every theorem of ZFC set theory is lower bounded by the commutator of constants therein as quantum transfer principle.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In 1981, Takeuti introduced set theory based on quantum logic by constructing a model analogous to Boolean-valued models for Boolean logic.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.